If you're interested in an exegesis of encryption from a legal perspective, I suggest reading one of the citations: "Encryption Workarounds" (O. Kerr, B. Schnei

If you're interested in an exegesis of encryption from a legal perspective, I suggest reading one of the citations: "Encryption Workarounds" (O. Kerr, B. Schneier) Georgetown Law Journal https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2938033 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2938033 > The first lesson of encryption workarounds is that there are no guarantees. Workarounds are inherently probabilistic. On one hand, no approach will work every time. On the other hand, that a target has used encryption does not mean the investigation is over. The government has to search for a workaround that might succeed. Note: The authors define a range of workarounds to include the "password sticky note on monitor" to "vendor installed backdoors".