"--> So why isn't this article about the Guptas? Shouldn't the headline be: "Indian-South African Gupta family swindles South Africa yet again?"" 1)A corrupt

"--> So why isn't this article about the Guptas? Shouldn't the headline be: "Indian-South African Gupta family swindles South Africa yet again?"" 1)A corrupt transaction requires the cooperation of at least two parties. If the Guptas could not find any co-conspirators, their ability to extract money from the South African government would have been reduced. 2)There are enough articles about the Guptas; there hasn't been enough coverage of the companies that enabled their corrupt transactions. "But they're clearly not the bad guys, and not even 'knowing enablers'." They aren't good guys, and they most certainly were enablers, the fact that they didn't do enough due diligence to 'know' is on them, and they will need to account for this and/or suffer the consequences.