3 ms·
It’s quite possible to run a high-traffic app with a small staff if you have the right engineering talent and developed the infrastructure thinking about scale
by mygo 8y ago
It’s quite possible to run a high-traffic app with a small staff if you have the right engineering talent and developed the infrastructure thinking about scale from the start.
Before facebook bought Whatsapp they only had 5 employees. But they had the best engineers for the task at hand. In fact they’re famous for handling 2 million TCP connections on a single server due to much of their engineering decisions (including choice of tech stack). And it’s not like they weren’t generating revenue. Before facebook acquired them, their $1 fee earned them $1billion the first 9 months.
- xkjkls 8y agoWhatsApp had 55 employees not 5. And additional features are going to add massive complexity and decrease your ability to scale relatively quickly. Sure, with the right engineering you might be able to run a relatively light operation if you have a feature-set well thought out, but as soon as you want to add any other thing-a-mo-bob to the operation it gets much harder.
- skinnymuch 8y agoAlso, they didn’t make close to $1B. More like 1% of that in the year before Facebook acquired them. If they actually made that much money they’d have more staff dealing with that.
- mygo 8y agoIt appears I have been given false information. Thanks for the correction.
- skinnymuch 8y agoWhatsApp had 50+ employees and made only tens of millions from their $1 fee. Where are you getting $1B from? It was never remotely close to $1B. FB publicly posted Whatsapp revenue from before the acquisition. It was a pittance. Whatsapp also only had a couple hundred million users back in 2014. So they’d have no way to make a billion even if they charged everyone. Which they didn’t. They barely charged anyone.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]