3 ms·
I think the difference is when your action impacts the existence of another conscious being, it's no longer just about you. Your examples seem like personal cho
by everdev 8y ago
I think the difference is when your action impacts the existence of another conscious being, it's no longer just about you. Your examples seem like personal choices, but in the hunting example, there are two conscious parties (the hunter and the animal) and both are required to be present for the action to occur (the kill), but only one party is consenting (the hunter).
If animals spoke in the hunter's native language we'd probably stop hunting or killing them because they could adequately express their fear and anger at being killed against their will. As it is, their running away and animal noises fall on deaf ears.
And yes, I don't eat dog meat (or any meat) for this reason.
- bluGill 8y agoYou are now showing your values though. They are not the values of the hunter. The hunter does not understand your separation. You will never understand each other because there is a fundamental difference.