2 ms·
It was definitely an explicit goal. There's a great book on the topic: https://www.amazon.com/The-Chosen-Admission-Exclusion-Princeton/dp/061877355X https://ww
by TAForObvReasons 8y ago
It was definitely an explicit goal. There's a great book on the topic: https://www.amazon.com/The-Chosen-Admission-Exclusion-Princeton/dp/061877355X https://www.amazon.com/The-Chosen-Admission-Exclusion-Prince...
Here's a quote from a summary:
> At one point, [Harvard President] Lowell wrote to a Harvard philosophy professor to explain that enrolling a high number of Jewish students would "ruin the college" by causing elite Protestant students to attend other schools, according to Karabel's book. Harvard would be ruined "not because Jews of bad character have come; but the result follows from the coming in large numbers of Jews of any kind, save those few who mingle readily with the rest of the undergraduate body," Lowell wrote in the letter.
http://www.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-discriminating-against-jews-2014-12 http://www.businessinsider.com/the-ivy-leagues-history-of-di...
- pvg 8y ago"Lawrence Lowell, Harvard's president from 1909-1933" Harvard's current policies do not explicitly have discrimination as a goal. They'd get sued to hell and nobody would go there if they did. Can Harvard's policies have effective bias or be applied in a biased way? Sure. But the Soviet stuff was not remotely as subtle, let alone subject to any kind of legal remedy.