> WPS had flaws in its implementation, but was reasonable on a theoretical level. Not sure about that since it has a key space of 10,000. Implementations with

> WPS had flaws in its implementation, but was reasonable on a theoretical level. Not sure about that since it has a key space of 10,000. Implementations without a timeout were super-easy to crack while those with a timeout just took time to figure out how long the timeout was and to not exceed it. I have a Netgear wifi bridge that doesn't turn of WPS (even if you click the button) with no timeout and is trivial to get the password out of while another case it took a couple weeks once I determined the timeout. *of course I only tested on my own devices and never engaged in wifi thievery from my neighbors