3 ms·

Another day, another browser vulnerability And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddle

Another day, another browser vulnerability And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddled_ with it. Another day, another OS vulnerability And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddled_ with it. Another day, another Android vulnerability And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddled_ with it. Another day another PDF/flash/etc exploit And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddled_ with it. Another day another security breach of a major non-WP website And people still justify using it 'because it's easy and simple for non-tech folks.' The non-profit world is _riddled_ with it.

Fellshard 8y ago
https://www.imperva.com/blog/2017/12/the-state-of-web-application-vulnerabilities-in-2017 https://www.imperva.com/blog/2017/12/the-state-of-web-applic... It's one thing to have periodic vulnerabilities in fairly central technologies that have few alternatives, and whose developers take those vulnerabilities seriously. It's another to consistently choose a technology that has visibly and consistently thrown security to the wind, leaves its users totally vulnerable, and has no reasonable fixes; especially when far, far more secure alternatives exist. So no, I don't believe any of those are valid equivalencies. WordPress is not the 'right tool' for any job. And PHP itself is also culpable in similar fashion.
- allenz 8y ago
  I am not aware of any serious vulnerabilities in an up-to-date WordPress site. Its security practices seem reasonable. Your link shows that most of the vulnerabilities come from plugins, plus WordPress is a big target. WordPress is simple to set up, simple to use, and has a huge community. In the real world, it is often the best choice.
  - Fellshard 8y ago
    Except WordPress is almost completely founded on its plugins, so that's a non-trivial consideration. Specifically, if WordPress cannot provide proper abstractions, sandboxing, and protocols for plugins to be secure by default, the issue could be greatly reduced. As-is, its model both encourages such flaws to be included and provides its non-technical users with no viable way to identify which are likely to be vulnerable plugins.
    - allenz 8y ago
      Sandboxing would be nice, but I don't think it's practical. Do you know of any secure plugin systems that can replace WordPress?
- pknight 8y ago
  Nonsense on stilts. More serious exploits are routinely found in everyday tech. This is not a serious exploit, a stock install of WordPress isn't vulnerable. The idea that WP somehow is especially complacent about security compared to other major software projects is just a trope. I'm sympathetic to the idea that WP need not be exposed when a site can be delivered with static files. That's a fair argument that I agree with. But no one's advocating abandoning IOS or Windows or Android because if you install a certain app, or if you use a browser or open a certain type of file you run the risk of exploits. To advocate the throwing out the baby with the bathwater over a bug like this suggests you cherry pick your concerns and/or have an axe to grind.

Fellshard 8y ago

https://www.imperva.com/blog/2017/12/the-state-of-web-application-vulnerabilities-in-2017 https://www.imperva.com/blog/2017/12/the-state-of-web-applic... It's one thing to have periodic vulnerabilities in fairly central technologies that have few alternatives, and whose developers take those vulnerabilities seriously. It's another to consistently choose a technology that has visibly and consistently thrown security to the wind, leaves its users totally vulnerable, and has no reasonable fixes; especially when far, far more secure alternatives exist. So no, I don't believe any of those are valid equivalencies. WordPress is not the 'right tool' for any job. And PHP itself is also culpable in similar fashion.

allenz 8y ago
I am not aware of any serious vulnerabilities in an up-to-date WordPress site. Its security practices seem reasonable. Your link shows that most of the vulnerabilities come from plugins, plus WordPress is a big target. WordPress is simple to set up, simple to use, and has a huge community. In the real world, it is often the best choice.
- Fellshard 8y ago
  Except WordPress is almost completely founded on its plugins, so that's a non-trivial consideration. Specifically, if WordPress cannot provide proper abstractions, sandboxing, and protocols for plugins to be secure by default, the issue could be greatly reduced. As-is, its model both encourages such flaws to be included and provides its non-technical users with no viable way to identify which are likely to be vulnerable plugins.
  - allenz 8y ago
    Sandboxing would be nice, but I don't think it's practical. Do you know of any secure plugin systems that can replace WordPress?
pknight 8y ago
Nonsense on stilts. More serious exploits are routinely found in everyday tech. This is not a serious exploit, a stock install of WordPress isn't vulnerable. The idea that WP somehow is especially complacent about security compared to other major software projects is just a trope. I'm sympathetic to the idea that WP need not be exposed when a site can be delivered with static files. That's a fair argument that I agree with. But no one's advocating abandoning IOS or Windows or Android because if you install a certain app, or if you use a browser or open a certain type of file you run the risk of exploits. To advocate the throwing out the baby with the bathwater over a bug like this suggests you cherry pick your concerns and/or have an axe to grind.