3 ms·
>I don't think that's correct. It is: https://www.apple.com/iphone-se/specs/ https://www.apple.com/iphone-se/specs/ https://www.apple.com/iphone-7/specs/ http
by tambourine_man 8y ago
>I don't think that's correct.
It is:
https://www.apple.com/iphone-se/specs/ https://www.apple.com/iphone-se/specs/
https://www.apple.com/iphone-7/specs/ https://www.apple.com/iphone-7/specs/
>I can see the coarse nature of the screen quite easily and it's highly annoying.
You are probably confusing it with a 3GS or something else. Apple has been selling “Retina Displays” ever since the iPhone 4.
You can't see the pixels in any such screens at any reasonable viewing distance.
>…the size is also too small to be of much use as a smartphone
That's not a statement of fact. The SE sells very well and not only because of its price.
>TFA is responsive to screen size, but there's only so much you can expect a website to scale. Just like a current website will look bad on a 8k monitor, it will also look bad on a smart watch screen.
That's not how responsive design works, that's just bad design. There's no technical reason to specify a minimum/maximum size and work within that range.
And that's not what they did either. Their CSS is responsive, they just added a <table> element (which is notoriously bad on mobile) that can't scale beneath 334px with current font/padding/border settings. That's just laziness or ignorance.