5 ms·
The price is more attractive (read cheaper) than AWS, but it is still on the pricey side considering the storage sizes people work with these days. Using persi
by lazharichir 8y ago
The price is more attractive (read cheaper) than AWS, but it is still on the pricey side considering the storage sizes people work with these days.
Using persistent storage with Google sets me back a little over $175 per TB of SSD, per month, without networking factored in.
At $0.20, time a thousand for a TB, Cloud Filestore comes to $200. Let's see how the performance goes.
- gigatexal 8y agoSpin up a huge render job, use the perf of the storage, and then nuke the storage as you have a final product? That's probably what they're getting at.
- sbr464 8y agoAre there reliability differences in the persistent ssd and filestore?
- pm90 8y agoLook closely at their announcement: you will see "enterprise" a few times there. While it doesn't make sense from an Individuals perspective, for enterprises it certainly is pretty affordable.
- ec109685 8y agoAre you able to read/write mount persistent storage to multiple instances at the same tome? I believe it is only multiple read only mounts — there can be only one writer.