3 ms·

I'd feel bad for the employees who took unnecessary dilution less than a week before instagram was bought by facebook. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/

I'd feel bad for the employees who took unnecessary dilution less than a week before instagram was bought by facebook. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/instagram#section-locked-marketplace https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/instagram#section-lo...

xkjkls 8y ago
I feel jealous of Sequoia VC's who managed to double their money in 4 days.
- balls187 8y ago
  Yes, very suspect behavior.
conanbatt 8y ago
Wow can you read this for me? I dont get it
- balls187 8y ago
  I think you're asking me to interpret my comment. Apologies if not. The link I pasted simply had a list of Instagram's financing rounds. April 5th, 2012, Series B $50m April 9th, 2012 Purchased by FB, $1b Several days before being acquired by Facebook, Instagram raised a $50m Series B on a $500m premoney evaluation, which gave investors 10% of the company. Typically in order to grant 10% worth of preferred stock for a raise, the company has to increase the number of shares. If there were 100 shares prior to the raise, and a had 1, I would have 1/100 or 1%. If there are now 110 shares, and I still have 1, it's now 1/110 or < 1% A few days later, the company was sold for $1b. 1/100 * 1b = $10,000,000 1/110 * 1b = $9,090,000 In my contrived example about dilution, with my 1/110%, I lost out ~$1m, and for seemingly no benefit to the company. Bringing it back to my original comment, employees as a collective, would have lost out significant money, for seemingly no benefit, while Sequoia benefited tremendously. I should caveat my post: --This is pure speculation on a number of fronts. Any number of scenarios could be true (even if unlikely) * IG could have had 10% shares already allocated in reserve for a Series B, and never had to issue more. Employees would still in effect lose out on money, but not because of dilution. * With that $50m in cash, IG could have paid out hefty bonuses to employees. IIRC at the time of acquisition IG had ~19 people. * IG could have issued anti-dilution to everyone, keeping relative % near the same. * The SeriesB may have had to happen in order for Sequoia to agree to the sale.
  - conanbatt 8y ago
    I can see that as a possible scenario but without the real numbers of dilution, it might have not had such a significant impact. Nevertheless sequoia did made a bundle and that was paid either by founders or employees. There must be some sort of funny business in that deal.

xkjkls 8y ago

I feel jealous of Sequoia VC's who managed to double their money in 4 days.

balls187 8y ago
Yes, very suspect behavior.

conanbatt 8y ago

Wow can you read this for me? I dont get it

balls187 8y ago
I think you're asking me to interpret my comment. Apologies if not. The link I pasted simply had a list of Instagram's financing rounds. April 5th, 2012, Series B $50m April 9th, 2012 Purchased by FB, $1b Several days before being acquired by Facebook, Instagram raised a $50m Series B on a $500m premoney evaluation, which gave investors 10% of the company. Typically in order to grant 10% worth of preferred stock for a raise, the company has to increase the number of shares. If there were 100 shares prior to the raise, and a had 1, I would have 1/100 or 1%. If there are now 110 shares, and I still have 1, it's now 1/110 or < 1% A few days later, the company was sold for $1b. 1/100 * 1b = $10,000,000 1/110 * 1b = $9,090,000 In my contrived example about dilution, with my 1/110%, I lost out ~$1m, and for seemingly no benefit to the company. Bringing it back to my original comment, employees as a collective, would have lost out significant money, for seemingly no benefit, while Sequoia benefited tremendously. I should caveat my post: --This is pure speculation on a number of fronts. Any number of scenarios could be true (even if unlikely) * IG could have had 10% shares already allocated in reserve for a Series B, and never had to issue more. Employees would still in effect lose out on money, but not because of dilution. * With that $50m in cash, IG could have paid out hefty bonuses to employees. IIRC at the time of acquisition IG had ~19 people. * IG could have issued anti-dilution to everyone, keeping relative % near the same. * The SeriesB may have had to happen in order for Sequoia to agree to the sale.
- conanbatt 8y ago
  I can see that as a possible scenario but without the real numbers of dilution, it might have not had such a significant impact. Nevertheless sequoia did made a bundle and that was paid either by founders or employees. There must be some sort of funny business in that deal.