4 ms·

Thanks for the input! I still believe it serves a very useful purpose. Serverless is still relatively new and somewhat daunting to some developers. rest-hapi wa

Thanks for the input! I still believe it serves a very useful purpose. Serverless is still relatively new and somewhat daunting to some developers. rest-hapi was designed to provide functionality as fast as possible so ideas can be tested and iterated with minimal overhead.

k8martian 8y ago
The only thing that daunting me to change the whole api to serverless is the cost. I know serverless itself is cheap but not the gateway and bandwidth price. It takes time to figure out what is the real cost you have to pay for the new bill without any surprise.
- JKHeadley 8y ago
  I'm not an expert in serverless, but doesn't it require a complete paradigm shift in how you structure your code?
  - ChicagoDave 8y ago
    Not really. Most new web application development is static to begin with, all of the code is delivered to the client browser and cached. Data is handled through traditional API's. The difference is that you drop your static front-end code (HTML, CSS, JS) onto object storage and your API's are created in async lambdas or functions. You're still using OAuth2 for API security. Now, learning how to do this in AWS or Azure from a DevOps perspective is definitely a paradigm shift, but the benefits far outweigh the learning-curve concerns.