> you run it in GCP where they take care of that part for you Although I'm generally inclined to agree with your positions on this thread (biased as I am due t

> you run it in GCP where they take care of that part for you Although I'm generally inclined to agree with your positions on this thread (biased as I am due to my Ops profession), this doesn't seem like a valid criticism. If Docker-on-GCP actually does address all the issues from the perspective of the developers/customers/users, then it's a plausible solution. The only consideration would be cost.