23 ms·
>if the law regulates interstate commerce and the targeted intrastate transactions would affect the interstate commerce subject to regulation Right, but the is
by SlowRobotAhead 8y ago
>if the law regulates interstate commerce and the targeted intrastate transactions would affect the interstate commerce subject to regulation
Right, but the issue is that's so laughably wide that it's meaningless. Esp as the internet has made things easier, you can be certain it's legally arguable to "prove" that even a small time seller of some good is measurably impacting big company X.
- gamblor956 8y agoNo, it's not so laughably wise as to be meaningless. For example, the interstate commerce clause cannot regulate service transactions (healthcare, legal, accounting, etc.). Esp as the internet has made things easier, you can be certain it's legally arguable to "prove" that even a small time seller of some good is measurably impacting big company X. That's not how it works at all. But what do I know? I've only successfully practiced law for a decade in state and federal courts.