> A Supreme Court case where property was seized without any charges is likely the only way we will see any progress on civil forfeiture. I posit it's a better

> A Supreme Court case where property was seized without any charges is likely the only way we will see any progress on civil forfeiture. I posit it's a better way (assuming SCOTUS makes decides an actual Constitutional question) than legislation, since it precludes legislators merely reinstating the practice later.