6 ms·
None of those three countries have a highly-guarded technology advantage which the US is trying to catch up on.
by lainga 8y ago
None of those three countries have a highly-guarded technology advantage which the US is trying to catch up on.
- vkou 8y agoChina investing into US companies is completely separate from the IP issue. For all intents and purposes, once you've bought a company, you've bought its IP. Buying a company is about the most legal way I can think of, for acquiring IP. Again - how does allowing foreign ownership of companies in your country harm your country? You mention IP - but it's not your country's IP - it's a particular company's IP. If its owners want to sell it, why does it matter if they sell it to an American, or a Chinese investor?
- rayiner 8y ago> If its owners want to sell it, why does it matter if they sell it to an American, or a Chinese investor? Because there are second order benefits to Americans of America being the world power. (E.g., Americans really don’t want to live in a world where you have to learn Chinese to succeed in the business world, as opposed to everyone else having to learn English.)