1. I provided 6 separate examples of the use of psychology (3 experiments, 3 real-world use-cases). You responded to one. 2. Something being biological is not

1. I provided 6 separate examples of the use of psychology (3 experiments, 3 real-world use-cases). You responded to one. 2. Something being biological is not contrary to it being psychological. Your response is disingenuous. You certainly are well-aware that your blanket statement was a rash, emotional inaccuracy. Rather than concede that point, you're choosing to try to nit-pick at one sixth of the refutation. This is HN, best just to admit your mistake.