3 ms·
Homelessness as a problem always has to be scoped at the geographic level where freedom of movement exists. In the case of the USA, that's national. The strong
by scarmig 8y ago
Homelessness as a problem always has to be scoped at the geographic level where freedom of movement exists. In the case of the USA, that's national.
The strongest predictors of homelessness are population density, walkability, and climate. Homeless people move to places that have those and away from places that don't. There's a theoretical case for provision of services driving homeless migration to the cities that provide services, but it's silly to imagine "progressive" policies generally being the reason why people are homeless. In San Francisco, if you're priced out of your home, you don't end up homeless for years on end; you need severe mental health issues or addiction to account for that. San Jose and San Diego are hardly wildly progressive, but they rank near the top on homeless population.
- dahdum 8y agoIt's not the reason most end up homeless, but progressive policies applied incorrectly can certainly exacerbate the problem. Excluding the dirty kids who choose the lifestyle, the easier you make it to be homeless and drug addicted the less likely they are to seek treatment. In Ottawa I remember the mayor pleading on television not to give any handouts or cash to the homeless, so they'd seek out the govt services that would help them. SF enables them far more than most cities...they can shoot up in broad daylight in a Bart station or busy street with no police response.