3 ms·
I'm still waiting to hear the name of the 'startup' that had a wildly successful product and failed to make any money. The key of course will be the definition
by hooande 19y ago
I'm still waiting to hear the name of the 'startup' that had a wildly successful product and failed to make any money. The key of course will be the definition of "wildly successful". We could use twitter as an example.
Is there any one on hackernews that believes twitter won't make any money when they finally decide on a revenue model? Anyone who is willing to say publicly that 37signals will be worth more as a business than twitter in 12 months?
Just to be clear: if your product is very popular, finding a way to make money will not be difficult. You might not make a lot of money (but DHH says that's ok right?) and you might have to sustain a huge level of traffic to stay in business, but you won't go broke.
- skmurphy 19y agoI would take that bet. 37 Signals > Twitter in 12, 24 and 36 months. 37 Signals has real businesses paying monthly for a service intrinsic to how they make money. There are clearly scenarios where Twitter can be more successful, but if I had to bet it would be on 37 signals. And I don't user their service but I do use Twitter.