4 ms·

You didn't look very hard then. There are plenty: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/23/technology/facebook-offers-privacy-checkup-to-all-1-28-billion-users.html

You didn't look very hard then. There are plenty: https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/23/technology/facebook-offers-privacy-checkup-to-all-1-28-billion-users.html https://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/23/technology/facebook-offer... https://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/facebook-stirs-privacy-concerns-again/ https://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/27/facebook-sti... https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/opinion/25tue2.html https://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/opinion/25tue2.html

dominotw 8y ago
> Where was this level of scrutiny before Fact that you had to look very hard and go all the way to 2010 to find examples proves my point not yours. Going back to 2010 doesn't mean plenty.
- bogomipz 8y ago
  If by looking hard you mean that I had type into a Google search box then yes it was very hard. I simply posted the first few result that were returned by my search query. And publication dates and volume of articles are completely orthogonal.