> I'm sure that without Zelda on the title, it would have been judged more objectively, for was it is: an average game to say the least. Without the Zelda titl

> I'm sure that without Zelda on the title, it would have been judged more objectively, for was it is: an average game to say the least. Without the Zelda title, it would have been treated the same as every good Zelda-like game: as evidence that Nintendo needs to revitalize the Zelda series. Instead it was a Zelda title, and so was the revitalizing that the series definitely needed. The fact that it was an outstanding game on top of that was just icing on the cake.