3 ms·
On a somewhat related note: https://www.wsj.com/articles/demand-for-batteries-is-shrinking-yet-prices-keep-on-going-and-goingup-1523871000 https://www.wsj.com/
by graton 8y ago
On a somewhat related note:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/demand-for-batteries-is-shrinking-yet-prices-keep-on-going-and-goingup-1523871000 https://www.wsj.com/articles/demand-for-batteries-is-shrinki...
I was able to read it via a google search:
https://www.google.com/search?q=duracell+energizer+high+prices https://www.google.com/search?q=duracell+energizer+high+pric...
From the article:
Shoppers are paying more for disposable batteries even though the proliferation of toys and consumer electronics powered by built-in rechargeable batteries has reduced U.S. demand.
That is because the two biggest disposable-battery brands, Duracell and Energizer, control over three-quarters of the market. As both focus on profits, they are no longer offering deep discounts as they did when they were racing for market share.
Batteries on average cost 8.2% more than a year ago, while prices in the overall household-care segment rose only 1.8%, according to Nielsen. At a time when prices are stagnating on everything from toilet paper to diapers, such pricing power for a product that is increasingly obsolete has confounded shoppers.
- ajross 8y agoThat's my intuition too. I mean, there is obviously the potential for a retailer like amazon to disrupt existing markets in an unfair way. But this market was really in need of some disruption. Are Amazon Basics batteries so successful because Amazon is leveraging its retail dominance or because the existing choices are overpriced?
- tomjen3 8y agoI wasn't able to use the google search, but the link works on archive.is http://archive.is/As0p5 http://archive.is/As0p5