6 ms·
Speech to text is certainly getting better but it makes mistakes. If the transcribed text was sent over the link and then a text to speech spoke at the other en
by peterbmarks 8y ago
Speech to text is certainly getting better but it makes mistakes. If the transcribed text was sent over the link and then a text to speech spoke at the other end you'd lose one of the great things about codec2 - the voice that comes out is recognisable as it sounds a bit like the person.
A few of us have a contact on Sunday mornings here in Eastern Australia and it's amazing how the ear gets used to the sound and it quickly becomes quite listenable and easy to understand.
- andai 8y agoCould you elaborate on "a contact"? Are you using Codec2 over radio?
- baobrien 8y agoYeah, the main use case for codec2 right now is over ham radio. David Rowe, along with a few others, also developed a couple of modems and a GUI program[1]. On Sunday mornings, around 10AM, they do a broadcast of something from the WIA and answer callbacks. [1] - https://freedv.org/ https://freedv.org/