It's not stating your opinion that's taken badly, it's your opinion that's taken badly. I think everyone in their right mind can agree that in most cases it's

It's not stating your opinion that's taken badly, it's your opinion that's taken badly. I think everyone in their right mind can agree that in most cases it's bad for society if you break into someone else's system. If you take it on a case-by-case basis, it's a little hard to make that statement. E.g. would it be bad if someone broke into a Chinese network and use the information to help/warn human rights activists? To break into a company that's conducting unauthorized experiments on unwilling or uninformed subjects and leak that to the press? It's easy to say that vigilante justice is never a good idea, but the victims who can't get any other kind of justice might very rightfully disagree. It's hard to even agree that it's always wrong to break into a computer system. To pronounce a minimum acceptable sentence of jailtime, and maybe even suggest that death penalty would be a good idea, too, is not something that's going to be taken well in the civilized world.