3 ms·
Instead, it should be law that it's optional for the candidate to ANSWER them. That opens another can of worms. Any refusal to answer implies something to hid
by jcl 19y ago
Instead, it should be law that it's optional for the candidate to ANSWER them.
That opens another can of worms. Any refusal to answer implies something to hide, which would be an immediate red flag.
- tptacek 19y agoThis line of reasoning seems nonsensical. There are no non-optional interview questions. But all questions asked during an interview are used to discriminate between candidates; that's the point of an interview. How do you ask a candidate what their age is without discriminating based on age? If you're not discriminating on age, why on earth would you ask the question?
- crisachow14 19y agoWell, true but how offensive is it really if you say that you would rather not say how old you are? I mean, women do it all the time.