3 ms·
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply the story was a secret. It was the murder of Michelle O'Keefe, for which Sgt. Raymond Jennings was wrongfully convicted. I wrote
by ClintEhrlich 8y ago
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply the story was a secret. It was the murder of Michelle O'Keefe, for which Sgt. Raymond Jennings was wrongfully convicted.
I wrote about Ray's exoneration in the Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-jeff-sessions-can-offer-justice-to-the-wrongfully-convicted/2017/04/12/ea3b3a3e-0e42-11e7-ab07-07d9f521f6b5_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-jeff-sessions-ca...
There's more details in a prior post on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12010760 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12010760
NBC News also did an episode of Dateline about it: https://www.instagram.com/p/BMnDkslA3wi/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BMnDkslA3wi/
- minhazm423 8y agoHow did you train yourself to solve cases? I cant help but let the hacker mindset speak for all of us and ask how did you "disrupt" this case, how did you learn, self teach? yourself what's necessary to solve a case? What were the legal channel you took to get someone exonerated? What hunch inspired you to investigate in the first place? And why that case? Surely there are many cases where the evidence just isnt compelling? What steps did you and your father take to go about getting this man out? How did you convince the DA?
- ClintEhrlich 8y agoThese are great questions, but I feel awkward hijacking a thread that isn't really about my experience. The Dateline NBC episode does a great job telling the whole story, including how I got involved. My Washington Post article explains how we persuaded the DA's office. I am an autodidact, so diving into new subjects is something I naturally enjoy doing. The obsessive focus and intellectual flexibility that helped me in other areas, like computer programming and missile-defense research, worked just as well for forensics and criminal-profiling. One example that sticks out is how I was able to refute the opinion of the FBI's top criminal profiler by going through and reading the reference text that is the equivalent of the DSM, but for behavioral analysis. He was listed as a co-author, so it would have been easy to assume that he was applying the standards correctly, but I was able to show that his thesis did not match the evidence. The hardest question to answer is "why this case?" It is as close to a miracle as I've ever experienced ... some force I can't explain caused me to stay up late one night and watch an old TV-special about the murder on my computer, even though I don't watch TV and had zero prior interest in the true-crime genre. The words of the accused professing his innocence before God were so powerful that, even as an atheist at the time, I felt compelled to look into the case more. Being used as an instrument to correct a horrible injustice made me reconsider my belief in a higher power.
- minhazm423 8y agoWell congrats man. That's impressive and im glad it was such an intellectual as well as spiritual journey for you. Teach me, or share with me some of your self lerning tips. You seem to be a high functioning autodidact, whats your method? Where do you get your knowledge? sources? Also, what is DSM? Missile-defense research? That sounds impressive, how would someone even get started on that?? And now forensics And criminal profiling. Now that you have a working proficiency in these subjects, what would you recommend others use to learn these subjects?
- arwineap 8y agoDSM is the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [0]. This is the reference text that describes and classifies mental disorders [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Manual_of_Mental_Disorders https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_and_Statistical_Man...