4 ms·
Also why no one really appreciated ISDN over here in central Europe. Yes, there are ways to do better _now_, and it would have been trivial to support channels
by namibj 8y ago
Also why no one really appreciated ISDN over here in central Europe. Yes, there are ways to do better _now_, and it would have been trivial to support channels with better codecs by negotiating something different than u-law 8kHz PCM, but back then that resulted in rather good quality. The issue was that few people got ISDN phones, which resulted in them using analog outputs on an adapter device, which got later incorporated into the internet router, which at one point switched from ISDN to VoIP. And people plug a phone via an analog jacket into the router, instead of using a VoIP capable phone or even anything digital. While many do use DECT cordless phones, those rarely use the DECT hardware inside the router, and instead use the one in the charging dock, which itself connects via an analog, POTS-bandpass-filtered, phone jacket to the VoIP router.
Oh well, we will probably never get that kind of quality, which is only possible with QoS on the whole path, if there is any congestion. That is the one thing something like rocket.chat and discord can't provide.
Edit: the way to do this is to force quality upon people, wherever you won't drive them away with the cost this incurs. That way people will associate your brand as a whole with the quality, i.e., in that case, people will associate AT&T with quality, not AT&T premium.
Normal people do not even know what kind of plan they are on, except for about one hour before and after they sign the contract.
- gsich 8y ago>Also why no one really appreciated ISDN over here in central Europe. Except Germany. Which had probably the best telephone system in the world when they deployed ISDN nationwide.
- namibj 8y agoI am speaking as a German. Sure, larger businesses used proper ISDN, but your uncle/mom didn't. The best you could hope for there was only DECT compression, aka ADPCM 4bit/8kHz.
- gsich 8y agoSure they did. Adoption rate was about 30%, possibly even higher at it's peak. DECT codec is useless if it's transmitted through analog lines, as it gets converted to standard 3.4k-Hz quality anyway. Except for in-house calls of course.
- bewo001 8y agoThe problem with land line voice quality is that people expect a land line phone / VoIP adapter to cost like 20 USD or Euro. At this price point you can't have fancy codecs and audio hardware that delivers a decent signal. Bad audio hardware with a good codec can actually decrease audio quality (the mic's noise no longer gets filtered as it is with 8kHz PCM).