Here's another link which compares musl, uClibc, dietlibc, and glibc sizes, features, and performance. http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html http://www.eta

Here's another link which compares musl, uClibc, dietlibc, and glibc sizes, features, and performance. http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html http://www.etalabs.net/compare_libcs.html It says musl's smallest static C program can be 1.8k as opposed to glibc's 662k, showing libc doesn't always have to be big and bloated.