3 ms·
a bit disappointed with the image quality. The original realsense r200 was probably the worst depth camera I've tried - it was barely better than two webcams an
by Jack000 8y ago
a bit disappointed with the image quality. The original realsense r200 was probably the worst depth camera I've tried - it was barely better than two webcams and parallax processing. The new cameras doesn't look to be much better from the video..
I wish there was better driver support for the kinect2, still the best depth camera you can buy imo.
- voxadam 8y agoHave you tried the much newer D400 cameras? I'd love to know how they compare to the Kinect 2.
- Jack000 8y agohaven't tried it, but I'd be surprised if they're comparable. Afaik all the non-kinect depth cameras are structured light vs ToF with the kinect2.
- namibj 8y agoThe one in the Lenovo Phab 2 Pro is a 35k pixel ToF, but artificially constrained in power and thus reach to live on a phone battery.
- progr4mmatic 8y agoThat wasn't the best example. Lots of noise in that high depth shot of a messy cafe + quick movement from the fan. If you look at the end of the new clip, even with high accuracy filtering, you're getting a pretty clean depth image closer up. I'm pretty happy with the D415 so far.