5 ms·
In the context of the NSA, I don't think it is very important. They are keeping everything inside a 100% fully-controlled-by-NSA datacenter, right? The "JimsF
by patrickg_zill 8y ago
In the context of the NSA, I don't think it is very important. They are keeping everything inside a 100% fully-controlled-by-NSA datacenter, right?
The "JimsFamousKefir.com" domain isn't going to be hosted on some servers in the next rack over...
- qop 8y agoI had kefir for the first time the other day and I'm pissed that I've wasted 50 years of my life not drinking it. It's delicious!
- cwilkes 8y agoJust wait till you find frozen kefir
- rl3 8y ago>The "JimsFamousKefir.com" domain isn't going to be hosted on some servers in the next rack over.. Unless we find out Jim is an NSA asset, and his famous kefir just a small piece of a larger network traffic injection/payload delivery operation.
- natch 8y ago“640k ought to be enough for anybody.” And the secure cloud should be just fine for protecting the archival copies of your family’s personal and private conversations stored in the NSA’s stash of “its” data. /s
- StanislavPetrov 8y ago>They are keeping everything inside a 100% fully-controlled-by-NSA datacenter, right? You're joking, right? Ever hear of a guy named Snowden? The idea of full, 100% control over anything is a fantasy.