Ok, your point was not at all what I expected and I have to concede it makes sense. But its also worth pointing out the that the best places for solar are usual

Ok, your point was not at all what I expected and I have to concede it makes sense. But its also worth pointing out the that the best places for solar are usually hot deserts, not arable land. Regarding Chernobyl and Fukushima, the radiation keeps humans away which is probably the biggest contributor to wildlife resettlement. But I still would rather see arable land made unusable by shade than by radiation