I do not see how FALSE is ever a reasonable assumption for an optimizer: " a+1 > a" is not a true statement for code emitted by gcc/clang on most architectures

I do not see how FALSE is ever a reasonable assumption for an optimizer: " a+1 > a" is not a true statement for code emitted by gcc/clang on most architectures (with or without frwapv) Can you put one of your fwrapv deoptimizations on godbolt or otherwise show it?