3 ms·
I've heard the analagy used that "Servers are to Serverless what wires are to wireless", the main point being that they're still there, but they're no longer so
by CodeM0nkey 8y ago
I've heard the analagy used that "Servers are to Serverless what wires are to wireless", the main point being that they're still there, but they're no longer something you manage or directly interact with.
I'm also starting to see the term LaaS (Logic as a Service) used as an alternative to "Serverless" here and there.
- _bxg1 8y agoI think the analogy falls apart because in the part of the system that's referred to as "wireless", there is literally no wire. The serverless comparison would be more like if they used a lot of zip ties and some well-placed rugs so you never saw the wires going directly to you computer and called that "wireless". LaaS sounds much more accurate/palatable.
- anothergoogler 8y agoNot just that, but "serverless" typically involves integrating a muddle of AWS/GCP/Azure services, locking you in. Portable software is the analog to "wireless" here, as it gives you the freedom to... move.