> I am almost sure that both would be faster than Numpy; that would be a good comparison. This seems a little unfair :). I’m pretty sure that if you’re using N

> I am almost sure that both would be faster than Numpy; that would be a good comparison. This seems a little unfair :). I’m pretty sure that if you’re using NumPy linked against MKL, it would be exactly as fast as Neanderthal running on MKL. Matrix multiplication benchmarks themselves just aren’t that interesting when all they are doing is testing an underlying library.