2 ms·
Yes but they are investigating our relative perception of the change. It's like studying astronomy without considering the fact that the stars we perceive in th
by badrabbit 8y ago
Yes but they are investigating our relative perception of the change. It's like studying astronomy without considering the fact that the stars we perceive in the sky is just our perception of how they looked like in the past. We distinguish how things are now from what we can perceive by measuring light and EMR. Why can't we at least consider the possibility that our perception of change might be different from the actual nature and attributes of this change?
- vermilingua 8y agoYou don’t need to consider that what you see in the sky is “in the past”. The light that’s reaching us has been travelling at c, the universal speed limit. Since we cannot possibly have known about that information sooner, what we see in the sky is for all intents and purposes, “the present”. Additionally, the hidden variables of the change are exactly what they’re talking about when people ask the question “what is time?”.