3 ms·
Lot's of empty claims. > some serious shortcoming and a lot more work needs to be put into these serverless platforms Not actionable at all > The approach t
by tucaz 8y ago
Lot's of empty claims.
> some serious shortcoming and a lot more work needs to be put into these serverless platforms
Not actionable at all
> The approach they're taking I don't think will last
No reason given
> It really needs a redesign/restructure
Nothing here too
> And maybe they'll improve it enough by then to make it viable
What makes it (un)viable?
- rgbrenner 8y agoThat's fair. I'm the founder of a company building a serverless platform. I didn't want to write specifics because it may reveal details about our approach.
- pedalpete 8y agoIsn't this a great opportunity to sell us on your solution, or get our feedback? You don't need to reveal details of your approach, but what are the actual problems you see? As a company that has built our most recent site completely on serverless, we've become familiar with some of the issues. Though I definitely would not consider it a no-go.
- juli1pb 8y agoSounds even more fishy
- maldeh 8y agoThat sounds like a very pertinent thing to disclose when offering a critique of a competitor, particularly when you're not able to substantiate (for legitimate reason or otherwise)
- nihil75 8y agoIn that case you might wanna take another look at the answers here. Notice how they all use Amazon Lambda? If you intend to compete with them - you might wanna reconsider.