> I wish they had gone further. In the modern age the concept of data hosted or stored with a “third party” is no longer useful in its entirety. ISTM that tha

> I wish they had gone further. In the modern age the concept of data hosted or stored with a “third party” is no longer useful in its entirety. ISTM that that's much more a task for the legislative branch than SCOTUS. Now congress is also defunct to a significant degree, but there's some limits to what you can infer from the constitution... > The way the bits are accessed is certainly relevant but the location of the network attached hard-drive should have absolutely zero bearing. Hm, but that's not really the question, is it? Email contents, and likely online storage contents, already has a warrant requirement.