> 1. The article says “Roberts noted that the decision also allows for warrantless cell-tower location information searches in emergencies and for national secu

> 1. The article says “Roberts noted that the decision also allows for warrantless cell-tower location information searches in emergencies and for national security purposes.” FWIW, that's not how I read Robert's opinion. He said that this decision didn't decide those (at least partially because it wasn't the question presented). > This means that any other data can still be obtained without a warrant under the CLOUD act which passed just a couple months ago. Isn't the stored communications act much more meaningful than CLOUD here?