3 ms·
eh, you should still be skeptical. This is a CIA contractor/employee we're talking about here. Child pornography is an interesting situation because no one outs
by djsumdog 8y ago
eh, you should still be skeptical. This is a CIA contractor/employee we're talking about here. Child pornography is an interesting situation because no one outside of the justice department and a few key people can even legally examine the evidence.
It shouldn't be beyond the realm of believeability to this bad actors created these charges in retaliation.