3 ms·
Houses near metros should be more expensive. It's higher quality living. That's the point. I fail to see a problem with that. But it would also make commutes ea
by matchbok 8y ago
Houses near metros should be more expensive. It's higher quality living. That's the point. I fail to see a problem with that. But it would also make commutes easier for everyone, rich and poor, just by building it. Bus routes, etc all point to metro.
Build more public transit would bring those costs down, though. Which was the idea.
And some of the stations on the silver line are most certainly not rich. Some are, yes. Others, no.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- masonic 8y agoHouses near metros should be more expensive. No, Houses near metro stations should be, and are, more expensive, with a premium price for greater distance from the line itself (e.g. buildings between you and the station to minimize noise). Homes near rail but far from stations lose value.