Right, and you make a good point that it does not make sense for all types of law. I think that these studies are a good thing and I would never want to discou

Right, and you make a good point that it does not make sense for all types of law. I think that these studies are a good thing and I would never want to discourage anything of the sort, but what is missing is a way to ensure consistency of test coverage. What I mean is that one study might record a particular measurement but a subsequent study may ignore that measurement all-together. Maybe what I'm thinking about exists in the form of discussions on sites like law.stackexchange.com or as articles in legal journals read by the experts.