30 ms·
If you are interested in this, you might also be interested in "promoter genes" which tend to be destructive to the organism they are part of, but which are als
by lkrubner 8y ago
If you are interested in this, you might also be interested in "promoter genes" which tend to be destructive to the organism they are part of, but which are also very good at promoting themselves, so they survive in the genome despite being harmful. A good book on the subject:
Genes in Conflict: The Biology of Selfish Genetic Elements
https://www.amazon.com/Genes-Conflict-Biology-Selfish-Elements/dp/0674027221/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1529667609&sr=1-1&keywords=genes+in+conflict&dpID=51LvhyS38vL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch https://www.amazon.com/Genes-Conflict-Biology-Selfish-Elemen...
- dfsegoat 8y agoIndeed. It is this sort of "worm-like" or "near-virus" -like behavior of these genes (transposons, promoters, etc) that made me decide to split the difference between comp sci and molecular biology (bioinformatics) as an undergrad. Nevermind the mitochondria - the powerhouse of our cells - which is basically believed to be a bacterial companion that our single celled ancestors integrated so tightly with - that it became part of our genome [1]. 1 - https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/the-origin-of-mitochondria-14232356 https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/the-origin-of-mito...
- mallomarmeasle 8y agoMitochondria are indeed thought to have arisen from incorporation of free-living organisms, but interestingly they mostly retain their own replicating DNA that is not incorporated into our genome [1]. 1- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA