What you are saying is when your hired goon fails to steal your neighbours cows for you, the cops should do it for you. ATT has not bombed Sacramento to achieve

What you are saying is when your hired goon fails to steal your neighbours cows for you, the cops should do it for you. ATT has not bombed Sacramento to achieve this, they have achieved this fair and square the same way farmers have managed to get some water from the greedy politicians over last 5 years or the same way teachers union in California has managed to suck our blood. This language of "break them up" is a violent language of thugs and should not have a place on a civilised forum such as this. (Not to mention as Mr/s. Dang would inform you it is not good idea to start political fights. But he also happens to be selective and likely he will give you an upvote and the warning to me) > 83% support equal access to content with net neutrality. Does not matter. That is irrelevant. Most people voted for Hillary but Trump is the president. You have to look at the rules of the game. Are those 83% people willing to change their vote in favour of a pro-net-neutrality politician during elections ? If not then even if that number is 100% it is irrelevant.