3 ms·
It is in fact a possibility that Smyte's terms were extremely one-sided.
by noobermin 8y ago
It is in fact a possibility that Smyte's terms were extremely one-sided.
- gnicholas 8y agoPerhaps the default terms were Smyte-friendly, but I can't imagine that some of these big companies (with savvy lawyers) would sign an agreement with a change-of-control provision that would permit this. There might be a carveout for consequential damages (which would be huge here), but this seems like it will trigger a number of sizable lawsuits against Smyte's new owner.