3 ms·
I don't think it is terribly different. Getting struck by a vehicle is at least as great a danger, if not a much more likely scenario, than ingesting magnets, a
by faitswulff 8y ago
I don't think it is terribly different. Getting struck by a vehicle is at least as great a danger, if not a much more likely scenario, than ingesting magnets, and is also not immediately apparent for the simple fact that the kids are out of sight. I would put "right to roam" laws as being in opposition to the banning of object like magnets or Kinder Eggs.
That said, I do understand they can cause great harm. But what do we lose when we choose to isolate our kids from reality?
- thomasfedb 8y agoA child being struck by a vehicle is almost always immediately obvious to the driver of that vehicle if nobody else. That said, I wouldn't ban magnets myself, though I'm against selling then directly to young children.