5 ms·
I think great number of people who use those services can't afford 5 grand jacket. I am talking about people making 100-200k a year. They are really anally viol
by merinowool 8y ago
I think great number of people who use those services can't afford 5 grand jacket. I am talking about people making 100-200k a year. They are really anally violated by taxes.
- vidarh 8y agoI earn in that range, and I'm certainly not "really anally violated" by taxes. In fact, I pay a lower percentage tax now than I did when I earned 80k, as the combination of higher pension contributions and other legal ways of reducing tax has a higher impact for high earners than for most lower earners. Overall, I look at my neighbours who earn less combined than I earn alone, and they're far worse affected than I am by taxes despite paying far less.
- merinowool 8y agoYou see, you also have tax arrangements to pay less. Sounds a bit hypocritical...
- vidarh 8y agoHypocritical how? I've pointed out exactly that taxes in that income bracket are in fact unfairly low. I consistently vote to redress that. You're the one claiming that people at my income level are paying so much we're "anally violated", when the reality is that our tax burden is quite insignificant.