I'm curious why the board used this old infraction as the justification. As if being allowed to use the standard "leaving to spend more time with family" story

I'm curious why the board used this old infraction as the justification. As if being allowed to use the standard "leaving to spend more time with family" story would be getting off too easy... Or maybe something something vague would arouse more suspicion? I suppose there is value in an acute, yet unrelated to performance story.