4 ms·
Paragraph 238 StGB absolutely does not hold here (I know from first hand). Also semantically you formed your phrase in such a way as though Europe as a whole ha
by eucitizen 8y ago
Paragraph 238 StGB absolutely does not hold here (I know from first hand). Also semantically you formed your phrase in such a way as though Europe as a whole had common legislation which is not the brightest thing to say.
But what do I expect from a community where there’s at least one thread daily speaking favourably of breitbart.com?
Lastly, ICE employees should think hard about the direction their upper ranks are going. They absolutely have a choice to not become 21st century Gestapo. It’s not too late.
- zaarn 8y agoEven if 238 does not hold, of which I'm doubtful, you still indirectly exposed another human to potentially deadly harm. I will not condone such immoral and unethical actions. I simply do not care if you believe they are the next Gestapo. If you want to be better than Gestapo, don't expose them other people, who are potentially innocent, to harm. End of story. Mob rule always leads to bad outcomes and this is encouraging mob rule.
- eucitizen 8y agoFrom first hand experience: Friend of mine made it public to several neighbours that a neonazi politician just moved in next door. He sued (also on the basis of Paragraph 238 StGB) and lost. Also, no none-publicly available information was posted. I will neither condone the acceptance of fascist tendencies, even in ‘rational discourse’ on HN. Check your heart my man.