3 ms·

> That leaves me to wonder as to the timing of this action. Krzanich received a lot of flak over the past months... it's not entirely unthinkable that the board

> That leaves me to wonder as to the timing of this action. Krzanich received a lot of flak over the past months... it's not entirely unthinkable that the board was sitting on this information and only now used it to get rid of Krzanich without making it look like it's one of the other major issues he could technically be blamed with. Agreed. AMD is breathing down INTC's neck, particularly in servers. Board wants a different direction.

Symmetry 8y ago
It's not just that. There's also the problems with 10nm. The prevaricating about the problems with 10nm. Meltdown. The 28 core 5 GHz demonstration where they misled people about overclocking. A whole bunch of stuff makes me feel like Intel just hasn't been a company I can trust while Krzanich has been at the helm.
- mistersquid 8y ago
  Krzanich also presided during the Spectre and Meltdown vulnerabilities for which Intel's messaging left much to be desired. Krzanich is also suspected by some to have engaged in insider trading. [0] https://news.alphastreet.com/chipmaker-giant-intels-ceo-brian-krzanich-resigns/ https://news.alphastreet.com/chipmaker-giant-intels-ceo-bria...
  - manquer 8y ago
    Perhaps he was selling coz he figured the relationship will surface soon and wanted out ?
    - jl2718 8y ago
      Or the reverse?
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]