3 ms·
I don't mind either, as long as the wealthy 20% don't use their (obvious) political influence to further their own ends. This can obviously happen without them
by einarvollset 16y ago
I don't mind either, as long as the wealthy 20% don't use their (obvious) political influence to further their own ends.
This can obviously happen without them being aware that they're doing that. A good example is the Chicago law prof who laments being too poor for the temporary Bush tax breaks to expire.
What he's not saying explicitly is; "I don't want to pay for healthcare for poor people". Probably as he's already got a pretty nice health plan already.
Now you can bet that a Law Professor has more clout than your average construction worker, so his ignorance at his own wealth is more damaging.
- Vivtek 16y agoThe wealthy 20% always use their influence to further their own ends. That's why income inequality is viewed as a problem in the first place. The percentage of wealthy philanthropists is never enough to make up for the lack of a prosperous middle class.
- einarvollset 16y agoI'm in utter and total agreement. Guess I wasn't clear.