4 ms·
My uninformed guess is that if it went to court the justification would probably be the (interstate) commerce clause. Its what they used for the war on drugs.
by sbov 16y ago
My uninformed guess is that if it went to court the justification would probably be the (interstate) commerce clause. Its what they used for the war on drugs.
- cookiecaper 16y agoIt's interesting that in the 1920s they recognized that a Constitutional amendment was required to prohibit a given substance (alcohol). You're right, it seems these days anything the Feds want to do can be justified by an allusion to "the Commerce Clause".